11 thoughts on “Pax Christi USA statement on Executive Orders impacting immigration

  1. Thank you, PCUSA!! We have so much work to do, and we must do it with mercy…so much work, but as someone recently said, “hard work is good work”!

  2. It’s good to emphasize the positive on this issue. I was, however, sad to see how mean and twisted were many comments from followers of YouTube in reaction to Bishop Budde’s gentle but firm advice to President Trump at the memorial service for the late President Carter. The public includes many who need to be taught common respect for people who look different from some imagined standard image of a human, male or female.

  3. It is good to see this strong statement. We should be further inspired to support our newly arrived brothers/sisters in our everyday relationships and in broader actions. Help to open others’ minds and hearts while helping to provide for legal, physical, and emotional needs. Peace.

  4. Thanks you for voicing these opinions and hopefully people will listen to them. However, there is much evil abroad.

  5. Great Message Pax Christi. Now it needs to be a voice from the pulpit and follow the example of Oscar Romero. That’s how God works: through our minds, hands and voices. The clergy must lead the faithful without fear.

  6. Pax Christi…Christ’s peace. Thank God there are voices in our country that speak words of love and compassion. Bishop Budde spoke such words on inauguration day to those who sit in seats of power. And thank you, Pax Christi for adding your words of support to those engaged in the work of bringing God’s peace in this time of uncertainty and fear.

  7. I really appreciate the nuanced perspective offered in your article regarding the impact of executive orders on immigration. The insights into how these orders create uncertainty for many families were particularly enlightening and shed light on a critical issue. To further this discussion, it’s worth considering the historical context of executive orders in immigration policies. For instance, previous administrations have also utilized these tools to navigate legislative gridlock, often leading to significant legal challenges. A lesser-known example is the use of the “writ of mandamus” in cases where individuals have sought judicial intervention to compel government agencies to act on immigration applications that have lingered without response. This legal remedy has historically helped individuals gain some relief when faced with bureaucratic delays. Given the ongoing legal battles surrounding current immigration policies, do you think the use of a writ of mandamus could become a more prevalent strategy for those affected by executive orders? What implications might this have for future immigration reform? https://criminalimmigrationlawyer.com/2024/04/13/removal-order-vs-deportation-order-understanding-the-legal-processes/

Leave a reply