by Tony Maglianotony-magliano

For those of us using the Gospel and Catholic social teaching as our voting guide, choosing between the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates was an absolute dilemma.

Hillary Clinton’s hawkish military attitude, like her vote to authorize former President George W. Bush to attack Iraq — which opened up the doors to the ongoing bloodbath in the Middle East — along with her aggressive support for the ongoing bloodbath of abortion, made it morally impossible for me to cast my vote for her.

And Donald Trump’s threat to deport millions of hard-working undocumented Latinos, his promise to “build a great, great wall on our southern border” insisting that “Mexico pay for that wall,” his temporary ban on Muslims entering the U.S., his threat to deport war-torn Syrian refugees, his plan to give massive tax breaks to the rich, his denial of alarming climate change, his determination to greatly increase spending for weapons of war, and his argument that American allies — including South Korea — should build their own nuclear weapons, made it morally impossible for me to cast my vote for him.

But I did vote.

I casted my write in ballot for the American Solidarity Party’s presidential candidate Michael Maturen. And I did so because this party’s platform reflects Catholic social teaching far better than any other U.S. political party (see

Now the hard work begins!

Deeply committed Christians, who cherish the Gospel’s social justice and peace message, clearly understand that we have a serious moral obligation to tirelessly oppose most of President-elect Donald Trump’s political agenda — which runs counter to God’s command to care for the poor with justice, to nonviolently build peace and to protect our earth home.

And as an ambiguous late-comer to the defense of the unborn, we need to hold President-elect Trump to his promise to appoint pro-life Supreme Court justices.

The expression “comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable” is most appropriate here.

As followers of the compassionate Prince of Peace, we are to comfort the suffering, to soothe their afflictions and to uproot the causes of their pain. And to those who are comfortable in being indifferent to the afflictions of the lowly, we are to prophetically afflict their comfortable indifference, to challenge their hard-heartedness and nonviolently fight against their inhumanity — while praying for their conversion.

Responding to Trump’s election during a recent speech at Georgetown University, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, the new papal ambassador (nuncio) to the United States, said the church needs “to assume a prophetic role.”

Using refugees as an example, he stated, “We have not done much, to be honest with you, on the issue of refugees in the United States. And we could do much more.”

To help us do much more, I have listed below several morally strong pro-life, social justice and peace organizations. I find them very helpful. Please sign-up to receive their action alerts.

[Tony Magliano, an internationally syndicated columnist on peace and justice issues, is available to speak at diocesan or parish gatherings about Catholic social teaching. He can be reached at]

4 thoughts on “Voting Was Easy: Now the Hard Work Begins

  1. Nice meeting you in Baltimore, Tony, two weeks ago.
    You might add to your list the Sierra Club.
    I like to think I can be both pro life and pro choice by working to change the laws not to put women and doctors in prison for abortion, but helping pregnant women financially and emotionally give birth to their babies. I’m thinking of free prenatal and postnatal care, no cost at the hospital for having the baby(both hospital and doctor paid by the government), 12 weeks of parental leave(both parents), free healthcare, and free education through university. I suspect few women under those circumstances would
    abort their child. All of the above paid for by raising taxes. The challenge for pro life citizens is paying more taxes to limit significantly the number of abortions. Otherwise, I assume they are not pro life but pro birth. As for Hillary, she said she is not pro abortion but pro choice. She could not run
    on the government paying women to give birth to their conceived child
    because she would never have been elected apparently. I assume voting as you did was a vote for Trump.
    Harry J Bury

  2. the PC folks at headquarters;  In the past few days, you sent me (us) a copy of “AN OPEN LETTER TO WHITE CHRISTIANS WHO VOTED FOR TRUMP.”   For some reason it got scrambled in my computer and I cannot access it. Would you be so kind as to re-send it to me ?  muchas gracias   Fr. Joe Mattern at the Casa Esther Catholic Worker House in Omro, WI

Leave a Reply to Mike GraweCancel reply