by Matt Southworth

It’s no secret that war is expensive. The U.S. has spent over $1,400,000,000,000 ($1.4 trillion) in Afghanistan and Iraq since 2001. This figure represents operational costs, not long term costs such as veteran care, which will rise for decades to come. However, looking at the fiscal year 2013 war funding request, you might think war is getting less expensive. Not quite. Funding overall is on the decline, yes, but the war in Afghanistan still costs $1 million per soldier, per year.

Overall, war funding is on the decline because of troop withdrawals from Iraq. Afghanistan funding is also down due to troop withdrawals. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 funding request for Afghanistan (known as Overseas Contingency Operations, OCO) is $88.5 billion, approximately $26 billion less than what was appropriated in FY 2012. But there is a hitch: the FY13 request assumes that 68,000 U.S. troops will remain in Afghanistan through September 2013, when the fiscal year ends.

To read the entire article, click here.

One thought on “AFGHANISTAN: War funding request denotes 68,000 troops through late 2013

  1. We have said again & again that if we intend to stay even for a little while in Afghanistan at great peril to ourselves from local junior G-men _ we must train before we leave that fragmented Nation a force capable of resisting those Communist forces from Russia & China whom many in our United States of America intend to turn Afghanistan over to ! And again i have even mentioned to a Comcast Telephone Operator from the Philippines – for we feel so desperate that so many leaders of American Foreign Policy do not mind this sell – out …..that our State Department seems more interested in Russian & Chinese welfare than the best interests of U.S. Citizens or any others – for that matter ……..franknkissy

Leave a Reply to kissykissy Cancel reply