Tag Archives: nuclear weapons

REFLECTION: Let the weapons fall from our hands! A gospel plea for peace

Scott Wrightby Scott Wright
Pax Christi USA National Council member

As we approach October 4, the Feast of St. Francis, the rumors and preparations for still another war in the Middle East evoke memories of the build-up to war in Iraq that occurred ten years ago.

In the last fifty years, the United States has initiated or intervened in a succession of wars in Southeast Asia, Central America, and the Middle East. These wars have caused enormous human suffering and loss of life, and brought pain and sorrow to families everywhere, including here at home. Can we endure the prospect of yet one more war against Iran?

Cathedral ruins in Nagasaki

Ruins of the cathedral in Nagasaki.

And what will the leaders of our church say this time? I remember returning from Iraq in January 2003 with Voices in the Wilderness, just six weeks prior to the outbreak of that war, and praying that the leaders of our church would stand up to our government and say no to war. I had just returned from the excruciating experience of accompanying young Iraqi children from southern Iraq in the Pediatric Hospital in Baghdad who were dying of cancer, most likely caused by depleted uranium used by U.S. weapons in Basra during the 1991 Gulf War. Surely our church would take a stand and speak with the same clarity against this war, as John Paul II had done so passionately, and not give a blank check to the government as it did once the war was begun on March 19, 2003.

Today I find myself returning to a still earlier October 4, 1965, when Paul VI addressed the United Nations General Assembly and called for war to be abolished once and forever, hoping that we will not forget his impassioned plea:

“If you want to be brothers [and sisters], let the weapons fall from your hands. You cannot love with weapons in your hands… It suffices to remember that the blood of millions of men and women, numberless and unheard of sufferings, useless slaughter and frightful ruin… unite you with an oath which must change the future history of the world: No more war, war never again! Peace, it is peace which must guide the destinies of peoples and of all humankind.”

On the Brink of War?

Today, we face another crucial moment in our journey as those who aspire to follow Jesus Christ in the way of peace and nonviolence. On September 13, 2012, the news agency Reuters reported that the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency passed a resolution, rebuking Iran for defying demands to curb its uranium enrichment and failing to quell mounting concerns about its suspected research into atomic bombs.

Both President Barack Obama and his Republican challenger Mitt Romney speak of leaving all options on the table to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatens to carry out a military strike against Iran. Increasingly, violence seems more seductive each day as it becomes the preferred way to resolve conflicts.

The debate over drawing “a red line” in the sand, and threatening military action is strangely reminiscent of the debate ten years ago in 2002, when President George Bush and the United Nations were engaged in a similar debate about Iraq’s possession of weapons of mass destruction. That was the prelude to more than a decade of war, based on a lie.

What lessons can we learn from the past? What wisdom may we draw from our faith? After a decade of war in Afghanistan and Iraq, can the U.S. and the world afford another war against Iran? Can we bear yet one more human life destroyed by violence?

John Paul II, whose native Poland was victim to aggression both by German fascism and Soviet communism, was no stranger to the destructive impact of war, especially upon the civilian populations. In his condemnation of war after the 1991 Persian Gulf War, John Paul II spoke words that could describe the consequences of any modern war, including that of Iraq and Afghanistan:

“No, never again, war, which destroys the lives of innocent people, teaches how to kill, throws into upheaval even the lives of those who do the killing and leaves behind a trail of resentment and hatred, thus making it all the more difficult to find a just solution to the very problems which provoked the war.”

Today, this description vividly characterizes what we know from the past decade of war against Iraq and Afghanistan: Innocent people destroyed, the lives of soldiers thrown into upheaval, those who have been the principle victims of the war filled with resentment and hatred, and the possibility of a just solution difficult to imagine. Surely the suffering caused by the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq makes clear the dangerous consequences of still another major Middle East conflict posed by a military strike on Iran.

John Paul II’s condemnation of war reached its strongest expression on January 1, 2000, when he spoke eloquently of the challenge of peace in his World Day of Peace message:

“In the century we are leaving behind, humanity has been sorely tried by an endless and horrifying sequence of wars, conflicts, genocides and ‘ethnic cleansings’ which have caused unspeakable suffering; millions and millions of victims, families and countries destroyed, an ocean of refugees, misery, hunger, disease, underdevelopment and the loss of immense resources. . . .  War is a defeat for humanity.”

This time around, however, that defeat threatens to further unleash – sooner or later – the destructive force of a nuclear war.

The Bells of Nagasaki

Some years ago, my wife Jean and my then eight-year-old daughter Maura, and I were fortunate to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the “epicenter of peace.” In the years since, I have tried to write about that experience, but have been at a loss of words to describe the enormity of human suffering and evil represented by what happened there in 1945. The saving grace was to meet with survivors – the hibakusha – who were my daughter’s age when the bombs dropped. That memory is seared forever in their hearts, and in their bodies.

Stokan-Wright family in Nagasaki

My family with the grandson of Takashi Nagai and Archbishop Joseph Takami beside the picture of Takashi Nagai.

One story that stands out in my mind is the story of Takashi Nagai, a medical doctor who survived the bombing of Nagasaki, lived to care for the victims, and returned to Ground Zero to build a hut where he received visitors as he lay dying. On Christmas Eve, 1945, a “miracle” occurred. The bells from the cathedral of Nagasaki, which was destroyed in the bombing, rang! Parishioners who survived the bomb blast dug up the bells from beneath the atomic rubble and debris, hoisted them up and rang them, morning, noon, and night. Takashi wrote:

“Men and women of the world, never again plan war! With this atomic bomb, war can only mean suicide for the human race. From this atomic waste the people of Nagasaki confront the world and cry out: No more war! Let us follow the commandment of love and work together. The people of Nagasaki prostrate themselves before God and pray: Grant that Nagasaki may be the last atomic wilderness in the history of the world.”

As Christians, our reflection on the challenge of peace begins with our own encounter with the Crucified and Risen Christ. It is our encounter with the crucified Jesus – present in the crucified victims of war and violence – that helps shapes our understanding of the urgency of peace and nonviolence. It is our experience of the risen Christ – in the survivors and witnesses who cry out for justice and for life – that gives expression to our deepest hopes for peace and reconciliation.

Our faith then impels us to look at the world from their perspective – of the children, the families, the poor who are most often the victims of war – and to work with the same passion and urgency for justice and for peace.

Violence in all of its forms is sinful because it destroys human dignity and the common good. When violence becomes institutionalized – as poverty, war or racism – it becomes a form of idolatry, denying the sovereignty of God and the redeeming power of Jesus Christ’s love. Nothing short of the total abolition of war and nuclear weapons from the earth must be our common goal.

Before visiting Japan, I went home to see my father, a World War II Navy veteran whose aircraft carrier, the Bunker Hill, was hit May 11, 1945, off the coast of Okinawa. Two kamikaze planes struck the ship within 30 seconds and nearly sunk it. Four hundred men died in the attack.

While I was home, he told me an amazing story. One of the men on my Dad’s ship had recently died, and his grandchildren had discovered in his attic the personal belongings of the Japanese pilot who had crashed his plane into my father’s ship. There were some letters, some pictures, and his watch. One of the grandchildren relocated to San Francisco, and there she contacted the Japanese Embassy to see if she could locate the family of the Japanese pilot to return to them his personal belongings. The day arrived, and the two families met to return the personal belongings to the deceased pilot’s family in a gesture of reconciliation.

I shared that story with our hosts in Japan. Nothing can undo the untold suffering that war brings on all sides, nor repair the destruction of precious human life caused by the atomic bombs dropped by the United States over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Only when we are joined in a common effort to abolish war and nuclear weapons might there be the real possibility of reconciliation and peace. But in that story, and that small gesture between those two families, formerly enemies, now reconciled – I find hope.

Where is the Hope?

Where is the hope? One powerful image that comes to mind and that gives me hope is that day, June 12, 1982, when a million people gathered outside in New York City for the United Nations Special Session on Disarmament to call for the complete abolition of nuclear weapons. It was the biggest demonstration on earth until the global anti-war marches that took place in dozens of cities around the world in February 2003, and an inspiring witness to the power of people to nonviolently confront their leaders and to call for the total elimination of nuclear weapons.

Today, thirty years later, the nuclear sword of Damocles continues to hang over the world, and to threaten a nuclear holocaust. The fact that less of the public’s attention is focused on nuclear weapons is of even greater concern, given the fact that we are still a long way from the abolition of these weapons from the face of the earth, and still further from the willingness of the nations of the earth – including the United States – to refuse to use them.

In his 2009 speech in Prague on nuclear weapons, President Barack Obama said: “I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.”  What can we do to hold our nation’s leaders to that promise?

The challenge is formidable. Yet we are not defeated. The impassioned cry for life of people across the planet who are standing up for justice, and their hope and ours to hasten that day of peace – is the gift and challenge we have been given by our loving God. That is the promise we hold on to, the victory of God’s redemptive love over violence that we proclaim, the urgent need to affirm Gospel nonviolence as the center of our lives and our faith as Christians.

As I left Nagasaki with my family, our host, Archbishop Joseph Takami, shared his own story with us. He was in his mother’s womb when the bomb dropped on Nagasaki – he is a survivor “in utero.” He took us to see the ruins of the cathedral, partially restored, and the names of 8,000 parishioners who died on that August 9, 1945 morning. He also showed us the burnt face of the statue of the grieving Virgin Mary, whose charred remains were buried in the rubble, discovered by a Japanese Trappist monk days later, and taken to his monastery before being returned to the cathedral decades later.

Archbishop Takami also showed us the house where Blessed Maximilian Kolbe lived during the war, before returning to Europe and facing martyrdom when he exchanged places with a condemned prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp. And he took us to another memorial site and told us the story of the 26 Japanese Christian martyrs who were crucified in Nagasaki harbor centuries before. The church was forced underground for centuries, and he proudly showed us the baptismal records and lectionary notes that his own ancestors had kept during the time the church was underground.

“No more war!” Takashi Nagai wrote from Ground Zero, before he died in 1951. The victory over violence has already been won on the cross, but the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have paid a terrible cost.

Perhaps what is required of us today, to be faithful, is to never take up again the sword, or to justify violence. Never again as a church to justify war – as we did in Afghanistan and Iraq – or to be silent when our nation goes to war. Then, perhaps, we might remember, every time we hear church bells ring, the bells of Nagasaki, and imagine, too, the faithful hibakusha gathered around the ruins of the Nagasaki cathedral that Christmas Eve, 1945, and their cry for peace.

Scott Wright is a member of the Pax Christi USA National Council and a member of the board of Pax Christi Metro DC-Baltimore. He works with torture survivors at TASSC.

ON THE LINE: June edition features PC members, groups in Newsday, NY Times, Washington Post, and more

Compiled by Johnny Zokovitch

Each month, “On The Line” features news items and announcements from around the nation featuring Pax Christi members, local groups, regions and partners. These are gleaned from articles in local newspapers, websites, magazines, and elsewhere. 

PAX CHRISTI MICHIGAN COORDINATOR FEATURED IN YOUTUBE VIDEO: Joan Tirak, coordinator for Pax Christi Michigan, was a featured speaker at the 10th anniversary celebration of the Lansing Peace Community. The event was videotaped and uploaded to YouTube. You can watch Joan’s speech here: http://youtu.be/x7tWykfP8DI?t=6m40s

PC Michigan Conference - Workshop on Racism

Floyd Cook leads a workshop on racism at the PC-Michigan State Conference in April.

PAX CHRISTI LONG ISLAND’S MEMORIAL DAY SERVICE FEATURED IN NEW YORK TIMES BLOG: Nancy Dwyer of PC-Long Island responded to the New York Times request for readers to share their Memorial Day rituals and traditions. Nancy wrote of PC-Long Island’s annual memorial at Jones Beach for the war dead, inviting people “to join us, even if only for a few minutes, for the solemn reading of the names of the war dead.” Nancy also wrote that Memorial Day “shouldn’t be a time to glorify war with an air show and a display of weapons to entice young people to enlist in more wars.” Read the entire letter here: http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/28/readers-memorial-day-rituals/

PAX CHRISTI’S RECOGNITION OF U.S. NUNS FEATURED IN WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE: In an article by Mary Johnson of Religion News Service on the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s report on the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, she cited Pax Christi USA’s recognition of U.S. women religious at our national conference in 2010. “As Pax Christi noted when honoring the sisters in 2010, the LCWR is composed of ‘strong, prophetic, and compassionate women … always on the front lines where the weak and most vulnerable suffer at the hands of violent and unjust power.’” Read the entire article here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/the-nuns-who-once-taught-the-bishops-arent-done-yet/2012/06/04/gJQAe2c4DV_story.html

PAX CHRISTI NEW MEXICO CO-COORDINATOR TO UNDERTAKE HUNGER STRIKE: This year New Mexico Pax Christi invites PCUSA members to join them in participating in Nuke Free Now, a weekend event Aug. 4-6th in Santa Fe and Los Alamos, N.M. We will transform the nuclear narrative in the public consciousness and inspire a life-affirming future. Alaric Balibrera, whose father was the film documentarian for Los Alamos Labs from 1967 to 1982, realized his exposure as a child to nuclear contamination and the terrible consequences of nuclear weapons. He will be hunger striking from July 16th to August 6th to increase the awareness to the mounting nuclear crisis that threatens all na­tions on this planet. Ellie Voutselas of Pax Christi New Mexico  has pledged to join his hunger strike from July 16-22. Others are invited to join in this action. Please see http://www.nukefreenow.org for complete information.

PAX CHRISTI ILLINOIS HOLDS MASS ON THE GRASS PRIOR TO MARCH: On Sunday morning, May 20th in Chicago, prior to the March for Justice and Reconciliation organized by the Iraq Veterans Against War (IVAW), nearly 100 members of Pax Christi USA, the Catholic Worker and 8th Day Center for Justice gathered in Grant Park for a Eucharistic Liturgy. Presiding at the liturgy was Fr. Bob Bossie, SCJ, a long-time Chicago peace activist. After Mass the group joined the IVAW rally and marched with the thousands from around the country who were saying “no” to NATO’s ever-expanding mission and ever-increasing costs that serve the strategic goals of the 1% while forcing austerity at home and destitution and death around the world. To see photos and read a full report, go here: http://paxchristiusa.org/2012/05/23/regional-event-catholics-gather-for-eucharist-prior-to-nato-summit-march-for-reconciliation-and-justice/

PC Illinois Mass on the Grass

Members of Pax Christi Illinois share in the Eucharist prior to joining the March for Justice and Reconciliation at the NATO Summit in Chicago in May.

PAX CHRISTI METRO NEW YORK HONORS JEWISH PEACEMAKER: The Times Ledger of New York featured an article on Rabbi Michael Weisser, who was honored by Pax Christi Metro New York at an awards reception on June 3. You can read the article here, http://www.timesledger.com/stories/2012/22/weisserhonored_ne_2012_05_31_q.html. Also honored were Bud Courtney for his peacemak­ing on the lower east side of Manhattan, in Iraq, and at the Arizona/Mexico border; and Carla DeYcaza for her work for hu­man rights, transitional justice, and nonviolent conflict resolu­tion in Africa. Read more at http://paxchristiusa.org/2012/05/25/regional-event-pc-metro-new-york-honors-peacemakers/

PAX CHRISTI HAITI COLLEAGUE HONORED AS ARCHITECT OF THE FUTURE: Daniel Tillias, Program Director of Pax Christi in Haiti and a frequent speaker to Pax Christi local groups in the U.S., was honored recently as an “Architect of the Future.” Daniel was recognized as one of ten outstanding social entrepreneurs from around the world. Read more here: http://architectsofthefuture.net/portfolio/daniel-tillias/

PAX CHRISTI MANASOTA CHAPTER OBSERVES MEMORIAL DAY: On Memorial Day, the Manasota (FL) Chapter of Pax Christi, together with members of the Coalition for Concerned Patriots and the Southwest Florida Coalition for Peace and Justice, gathered around the Peace Pole erected several years back at Island Park—in the Sarasota Bayfront area—to remember in song and prayer all who locally stood for peace and justice and had passed on before us. We remembered fifteen area peace activists, including Les Druckemiller who was responsible for erecting the Peace Pole.  About twenty people gathered for the service and a picnic luncheon.

Upcoming Events:

Quicklinks:

Pax Christi Houston honors U.S. vets by calling for an end to the war in AfghanistanPax Christi Metro DC-Baltimore has posted an excellent prayer service on the use of drones by Art LaffinPax Christi Michigan conference inspires hope, action … Pax Christi Long Island board member and Pulitzer Prize winner Bob Keeler writes about his worst nightmare in Newsday … Pax Christi Baltimore’s Chuck Michaels is featured talking about liturgy in this article in the Herald Malaysia Online … Jim O’Callahan of Downtown Brooklyn Pax Christi wrote this review on the film Cite Soleil: Sun, Dust and Hope … Read the thoughts and opinions of Mike McCarthy of Blue Water (MI) on his blogPax Christi Maine hosted a state assembly titled “Resisting the Culture of Violence” in May … Pax Christi Long Island’s Memorial  Day service was mentioned in a letter to the editor to Newsday … Read Pax Christi International’s June newsletter … JustFaith Ministries in collaboration with Pax Christi USA just released a special 12 session module for small groups on “Just Peacemaking.” There is a special discount for Pax Christi local groups wanting to purchase the module … PCUSA is seeking an Associate Director of Development and a Program Director

  • Send your news items, announcements, photos and links to stories about Pax Christi groups or members to johnnypcusa@yahoo.com.

PAX CHRISTI INTERNATIONAL: PCI joins World Council of Churches in urging NATO to withdraw nukes in Europe

from Pax Christi International

Pax Christi InternationalThe World Council of Churches and Pax Christi International appeals to NATO not to further delay the withdrawal of U.S. tactical nuclear weapons from Europe.

The statement follows three previous calls by four ecumenical Councils with together some 200 member churches in Europe and North America urging NATO to end ‘nuclear sharing’ with five non-nuclear NATO allies in Europe where U.S. nuclear weapons are still stored, more than two decades after the Cold War.

These five European countries are Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, Italy and Turkey.

On its summit on 20-21 May 2012 in Chicago, NATO must make decisions about their future. However, NATO remains divided and is likely to postpone decisions again and making urgently needed steps dependent on Russian reciprocity.

In the new WCC statement, supported by Pax Christi Internationalis, the churches call this “a recipe for deadlock.”

See: http://www.oikoumene.org/en/news/news-management/eng/a/article/1634/churches-regret-nato-dela.html

For more details about the four Councils arguments, see their joint 11 March 2011 letter: http://www.oikoumene.org/en/resources/documents/general-secretary/wider-ecumenical-movement-incl-wcc/follow-up-on-the-adoption-of-natos-strategic-concept.html

IRAN: War drums never stop beating

Tony Maglianoby Tony Magliano

I hope I’m wrong, but it looks like the United States is preparing to start another war.

While the dust hasn’t even settled yet from the Iraq war, hawks in Congress and the Obama administration are pushing to attack Iran. But because the fever to attack Iran is even higher in Israel, it appears more likely that President Obama will give the Israelis the green light to launch the initial strike with U.S. support.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta reportedly said that Israel would  probably attack Iran between April and June. With two new U.S. aircraft carrier strike groups having entered the Arabian Sea, the U.S. could easily find itself fully embroiled in yet another war.

Is Iran building a nuclear weapon? On CBS’s “Face the Nation” Panetta answered that question. He said “Are they trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No.”

All of this sounds terribly familiar.

Remember President George W. Bush’s claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction? There was no solid evidence there either, but that didn’t stop the Bush administration and Congress from starting an immoral “preventive war” that caused the deaths of more than 4,400 U.S. military personnel, and hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis.

But even if Iran is attempting to build nuclear weapons, a U.S./Israeli attack upon that nation would be gravely immoral. A so called “preventive war” would not meet the very strict conditions of the Just-War Theory. It would not be a measure of last resort; it would surely kill many innocent Iranians, serve as a recruitment tool for terrorists’ organizations and could lead to an even larger regional war.

Following the 1991 Persian Gulf War, Blessed Pope John Paul II declared:  “No, never again, war, which destroys the lives of innocent people, teaches how to kill, throws into upheaval even the lives of those who do the killing and leaves behind a trail of resentment and hatred, thus making it all the more difficult to find a just solution to the very problems which provoked the war.”

A nuclear armed Iran would certainly not be good for the Middle East nor the world. But it is the height of hypocrisy for the United States, which possesses over 10,000 nuclear weapons, and Israel which has approximately 200 such weapons, to insist that Iran must not be allowed to enter the nuclear club.

Furthermore, consider a report by former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Dr. Paul Craig Roberts that the U.S. now has 44 military bases surrounding Iran. Isn’t it logical for Iran to feel threatened?

To be sure, some of Iran’s leaders have often sounded belligerent. And that is certainly counterproductive to peace. But in fairness consider that Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and Israel is not. Iran permits International Atomic Energy Agency inspections, and Israel does not. Israel is gearing up to attack Iran. Iran is not about to attack Israel.

Unfortunately, the most important issue here is not being addressed: the grave danger posed to humanity by any nation possessing nuclear weapons. The moral high-road the U.S. government should be on is the route that urgently leads to total multilateral nuclear disarmament.

But that road will never be traveled by our government until Christians stop trying to justify nuclear weapons, “preventive war,” as well as war in general, and start taking seriously Jesus’ teaching that God’s children are called to be peacemakers.

Tony Magliano is a nationally syndicated social justice and peace columnist.

NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT: Freeze spending on nuclear weapons and fund social programs instead

From FCNL

Every year the U.S. spends more than $50 billion maintaining the country’s arsenal of nuclear weapons.  Today, the nuclear arsenal still exceeds 5,000 warheads.

Representative Ed Markey (MA-7) has written a letter to his colleagues asking them to join him in urging the “super committee” to freeze spending on nuclear weapons in order to avoid cutting funding to other important social programs. The super committee is a group of six senators and six representatives, otherwise known as the “gang of 12,” charged with developing a plan to reduce the country’s deficit by at least $1.5 trillion over the next ten years. The plan must be completed by Nov. 23, 2011.

See which representatives have signed on by clicking here!

Click here and ask your representative to sign on.

Below is the text of Rep. Markey’s letter:

Dear Members of the Super Committee:

The Berlin Wall fell. The Soviet Union crumbled. The Cold War ended. Yet 20 years later, we continue to spend over $50 billion a year on the U.S. nuclear arsenal. This makes no sense. These funds are a drain on our budget and a disservice to the next generation of Americans. We are robbing the future to pay for the unneeded weapons of the past. Now is the time to stop fighting last century’s war. Now is the time to reset our priorities. Now is the time to invest in the people and the programs to get America back on track.

The Super Committee is best positioned to cut this outdated radioactive relic. The Soviets are long gone, yet the stockpiles remain. The bombs collect dust, yet the bills are with us to this day. We call on the Super Committee to cut $20 billion a year, or $200 billion over the next ten years, from the U.S. nuclear weapons budget. This cut will enable us to stay safe without further straining our budget. This cut will improve our security. This cut will allow us to continue funding the national defense programs that matter most.

Consider how this savings compares to vital programs on which Americans rely. We spend approximately $20 billion per year on Pell Grants to help students pay for college. We spend $5 billion to ensure that Americans do not freeze in their homes during the winter. We need to freeze our nuclear weapons, and fuel our stalled economy.

The Ploughshares Fund estimates that the U.S. will spend over $700 billion on nuclear weapons and related programs over the next ten years. Nuclear weapons and missile defense alone will consume over $500 billion. We can no longer justify spending at these levels. We can save hundreds of billions of dollars by restructuring the U.S. nuclear program for the 21st century.

Our current arsenal totals over 5,000 nuclear warheads. This enormous stockpile will allow us to annihilate our enemies countless times. At any one time there are 12 Trident submarines cruising the world’s seas. Each submarine carries 24 nuclear weapons. Each submarine is capable of destroying all of Russia’s and China’s major cities. Why then do we need all of these weapons? There is no good reason. America no longer needs, and cannot afford, this massive firepower.

The Super Committee should not reduce funding to vital programs relied upon by millions of Americans. Cut Minuteman missiles. Do not cut Medicare and Medicaid. Cut nuclear-armed B-52, B-1, and B-2 bombers. Do not cut Social Security. Invest in the future, don’t waste money on the past.

We do not need to maintain our current level of nuclear weapons to secure our country. The President agrees. The Senate agrees. The New START treaty will reduce our level of deployed strategic warheads to 1,550. This is a 25 percent cut from today’s levels. Fewer nuclear weapons should equal less funding.

We should not cut entitlement programs first. We should not target our seniors, our children, and our sick first. Instead we should target outdated and unnecessary nuclear weapons. Let’s freeze the nukes so we can fund the future.

Sincerely,
Edward J. Markey

NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT: No belt-tightening at Oak Ridge

By Ralph Hutchison, Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance

New weapons facility plannedIs anybody in Congress really serious about fiscal responsibility?

If there are serious waste cutters in D.C., I wonder why I haven’t heard them ask a simple question: Why is the government planning to build a $7.5 billion bomb plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee they don’t need?

Before you roll your eyes at the typical anti-nuke rhetoric, get this. The study that says they don’t need a $7.5 billion dollar bomb plant was prepared by…wait for it—the National Nuclear Security Administration. That’s right, the same government agency that says they are going to build it.

For $200 million or less, they can modernize the current facilities to meet environmental, safety and health standards and meet mission requirements. Not good enough, because contractors can smell money.

Since the new bomb plant—the Uranium Processing Facility—was first proposed in 2005, its price tag has gone up 1200%. No, that’s not a typo. The cost in 2005 was $600 million; last year it soared to $6.5 billion; last week it leaped again—to $7.5 billion according to the Army Corp of Engineers.

So Republicans, Democrats, Tea Partiers, Socialists, Independents—anybody serious about cutting spending? Seriously. This is low-hanging fruit.

Last week the National Nuclear Security Administration issued its final Record of Decision on the new bomb plant for Oak Ridge. After studying several alternatives, it chose the $7.5 billion one. Even though—government’s own figures—a smaller facility would be adequate to meet mission requirements and would be—government’s own words—“environmentally preferable.”

The new bomb plant in Oak Ridge is sized to produce 80 thermonuclear “secondaries” per year—though the government documents say they need to make less than 15 a year to assure the safety and reliability of the US nuclear stockpile. Insiders say 5-10/year is plenty. So why the bigger bomb plant? Because they want it soooooo bad.

If none of this makes sense to you, it’s because it doesn’t make sense. It’s a government pork project. For sixty years they’ve spent our tax dollars like teenagers who don’t have to put gas in the tank. It’s time for the adults—if there are any in Congress—to shut the wallet. “Do what you can with what you have” would be a nice motto.

If the U.S. wants to maintain a nuclear stockpile of 1,500 warheads, it can do it without a new bomb plant. If the U.S. truly wants to dissuade other countries (like Iran) from pursuing nuclear weapons, making major investments in new production capacity in the United States is exactly the wrong way to do it.

Any Congressperson out there who wants to get serious about fiscal responsibility, or just give a nod to fiscal sanity, should take a peek at the nuclear weapons budget. Ask yourself why, when the whole country is tightening its belt, the folks in Oak Ridge are out shopping for bigger trousers.

If the country needed it for security or defense, that might be one thing. But we don’t—and don’t take my word for it. Take the National Nuclear Security Administration’s word for it—they’re the ones who build the bombs.

Ralph Hutchison is the coordinator of OREPA.

PRESS RELEASE: Take nuclear weapons off high-alert

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SYDNEY, PARIS, WASHINGTON, MOSCOW COLONELS, AMBASSADORS, MEPS, NGOS, URGE P5 MEETING TO TAKE NUKES OFF HIGH ALERT

As the Permanent Five meeting on nuclear security gets under way in Paris, a letter signed by retired senior military, former UN ambassadors, parliamentarians, and many NGOs asking for nuclear weapons to be taken of high alert as a matter of urgency, has been released. The letter was faxed a number of weeks ago to P5 presidents, foreign ministers/secretaries of state and secretaries of defence/defence ministers. The letter points out that even after the successful signing and ratification of new START, thousands of nuclear weapons, notably in the US and Russian arsenals, remain poised to fire at less than two minutes notice. Computer error, mistakes, unusual weather phenomena that look exactly like a launch,  weather research rockets, miscalculation, malfunctioning equipment and plain panic have over the decades that these missiles have been kept on alert, led the planet to within minutes or even seconds of an avoidable apocalypse.The actual use of these 2-5000 warheads, most likely as a result of a malfunctioning chip somewhere in Nebraska or Kosvinsky Mountain, can still end not merely civilization, but 95% of complex, land-based, living things, or at least change the climate from global warming to a nuclear winter for a number of decades.

The International Commission on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament (ICNND) as well as earlier international commissions,  have stressed the urgency of  action to lower nuclear risks, especially between the US and Russia. A number of UN resolutions urge action to take nuclear weapons off alert.

The letter has been signed by a total of 98 organizations and distinguished individuals, including Colonel Valery Yarynich (former Soviet Missile Corps Command and Control), Commander Robert D. Green (British navy – Ret) , Former  Australian Disarmament Ambassador Richard Butler, Mayors For Peace 2020 Vision Campaign, the Global Security Institute, CND, Gensuikyo, a number of parliamentarians and MEPs, and NGOs from the US, Russia, Canada, the UK, Norway, Australia, New Zealand, and around the world.

Contact: