Category Archives: Nonviolence

BOOK REVIEW: When conscience and a passion for peace lead to jail time

colman_mccarthy_140by Colman McCarthy
Pax Christi USA Ambassador of Peace

In March 2004 Rosalie Riegle, a professor of English at Saginaw Valley State University in Michigan from 1969 to 2003, was one of eight Catholic Worker peace advocates arrested for trespassing at Nebraska’s Offutt Air Force Base, the command center for the military’s entire nuclear arsenal. At her bench trial, Riegle lucked out. She received no jail time. Her punishment was a verbal punch from the judge, scolding that she “was old enough to know better.”

079308_protest_RED_Maybe. If she didn’t know better, it was clear she wanted to know more, starting with questions about the other disturbers in the Offutt Eight. What motivated them? And questions about the much larger community of war resisters who take to heart Albert Einstein’s advice: “Never do anything against conscience, even if the state demands it.” What effect, Riegle wondered, does imprisonment have on those who defy their government’s military violence with acts of personal nonviolence? Do marriages and relationships endure while one partner is in a cell and the other is home raising the children? How do the willingly incarcerated deal with the reality that American militarism rolls on unabated? How do they feel about of getting free room and board at the government’s expense, when the money could be used in a social program?

Detailed and insightful answers to those and other questions can be found in the pages of Doing Time for Peace. For three years after the Offutt experience, Riegle interviewed 173 conscience-driven people who took deliberate actions, from destruction of weapons to burning draft cards, to resist the war policies of a government that Martin Luther King Jr. called the “greatest purveyor of violence in the world.” Withholding complicity with leaders who wage and fund the violence, they joined the tradition of imprisoned dissenters that include the sung — Eugene Debs, Norman Thomas, Dorothy Day, the Berrigan brothers, David Dellinger, Howard Zinn, Joan Baez, Ammon Hennacy — and the unsung…

Click here to read this entire article.

RESOURCE: Special supplement on “Pacem in Terris” now included in the “Just Peacemaking Initiative” module

Last year, JustFaith Ministries in collaboration with Pax Christi USA published an excellent resource for small groups entitled, Just Peacemaking Initiative: The Challenge and Promise of Nonviolence for Our Time

pacemweb-newsIn celebration of the 50th anniversary of Pope John XXIII’s encyclical Pacem in Terris (Peace on Earth), JustFaith Ministries is now including in the module a Special Supplement: 50th Anniversary of Pacem in Terris. This document was created by Pax Christi USA National Council member Scott Wright, the author of the module itself, for groups who want to highlight and provide additional content related to this critical 1963 encyclical.

The supplement is designed to provide excerpts from the encyclical that correlate to the four main sections/priorities defined in the module:

  • Spirituality of Nonviolence and Peacemaking
  • Just Peacemaking and Economic and Interracial Justice
  • Just Peacemaking, Disarmament and Reconciliation with Justice
  • Just Peacemaking, Human Rights, and Global Restoration

This new material can be substituted for existing sections of Sessions 1, 4, 7 & 10.   Suggested discussion questions are included.

Click here to order the module with the new supplement included.

For additional information, contact David Horvath at david@justfaith.org.

DRONES: Studying moral ramifications in “Ten Reflections on Drones”

Rev. John Dear, S.J.

by Fr. John Dear, S.J.
Pax Christi USA Ambassador of Peace

Last week, Dr. Robert J. Lifton, the esteemed psychiatrist and author of many important books such as The Nazi DoctorsHiroshima in America and Destroying the World to Save It, published a long, brilliant essay about the moral ramifications of drones. In “Ten Reflections on Drones” (Part OnePart Two), Lifton argues that we better start grappling with the effects of drones in our lives and get rid of them before they take us to entirely new levels of psychic numbing and global violence.

“I seek to begin a conversation about our relationship as human beings to these robotic objects as weapons,” Lifton writes.

Like many, I, too, have been long pondering the omnipresence of drones, the Obama administration’s criminal commitment to drones and their subtle effect on all our lives. Since my arrest at the Creech Air Force Base, the national drone headquarters, and my recent trip to Afghanistan, where I heard many stories of relatives who lost loved ones from our drones, I’m convinced these drones are destroying us, too — spiritually. As someone once said, “Those who live by the sword will die by the sword.”

I think all those who care for peace should study Lifton’s 10 points about drones. Here is a shortened version of his 10 “meditations” on drones and the illusion that they work

Click here to read this entire article.

NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT: A reflection post-trial on the Transform Now Plowshares

laffinby Art Laffin
the Dorothy Day Catholic Worker House

To begin, I am compelled to express heartfelt gratitude to the OREPA Community for the incredible loving hospitality extended to all who came to the trial. From arranging where people would sleep, to preparing evening meals, to organizing transportation, drop-offs and pick-ups, the OREPA Community pulled out the stops to accommodate EVERYONE. Thanks be to God for the OREPA Community and for their steadfast peace witness at Y-12 spanning many years. This witness has been, and continues to be, a great beacon of life and hope for our human family.

fruit-of-justice-tnpThe community of faith and resistance that gathered from around the U.S. and from Tennessee to stand with the TNP was a remarkable gift beyond measure. Each day the main courtroom used for the trial and a nearby overflow courtroom were filled to capacity. This outpouring of support demonstrated to the court, the jury, the media, the city of Knoxville and the nation that Sr. Megan, Mike and Greg were not alone in their desire to see the swords of our time hammered into plowshares.

Unsurprisingly, what emerged during the government’s case and throughout the trial was the repeated claim by the prosecutors Mr. Theodore and Ms. Kirby  that to merely go onto the Y-12 site was obstructing the national defense. Further, because the TNP were able to cut through fences and get to the Highly Enriched Uranium Facility (HEUF), this action had negatively affected the credibility of Y-12 and the U.S. nuclear deterrent, according to government witness, Steve Erhart, the Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration manager at Y-12. During his testimony Erhart described how Y-12 developed and processed uranium for the first atomic bomb and has been involved in the production of nuclear weapons ever since. Y-12 makes uranium parts for nuclear warheads, dismantles old weapons and is the primary storehouse for bomb-grade uranium in the U.S., he said. Under cross-examination, Erhart admitted that the use of U.S. nuclear weapons would be “devastating,” similar to the death and destruction caused by U.S. nuclear weapons used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Erhart also acknowledged that the TNP action exposed the numerous security failures of Y-12. A  report by the DOE’s inspector general said Y-12 security failures included broken detection equipment, poor response from security guards and insufficient federal oversight of private contractors running the facility.

The testimony of Kirk Garland, the first security guard on the scene was illuminating. Upon seeing the early morning witness and encountering Sr. Megan, Greg and Mike, he stated “I knew what I had.” Despite the fact that the TNP were in a deadly force zone, he knew from his experience of working at Rocky Flats and Pantex nuclear weapons facilities that they were peace activists and did not feel compelled to use deadly force. He was faulted for this by his superiors and was subsequently fired. It was pointed out several times during the trial that Garland was really the scapegoat for this embarrassing security breach.

Sr. Megan, Mike and Greg spoke movingly about why they acted and what they did, taking full responsibility for their actions. Sr. Megan conveyed that she went to Y-12 because all life is imperiled by nuclear weapons and that she sought to bring healing, forgiveness and transformation there. “My regret was I waited 70 years,” she said. ”Y-12 is manufacturing that which can only cause death.” She also spoke of how her uncle, who had visited Nagasaki six weeks after the bombing, had a great impact on her. And she was able to offer a powerful reading of the TNP action statement. Mike shared that he was complicit in committing war crimes as a soldier during the U.S. war in Vietnam and Cambodia. He said he was compelled to emulate the example given by Jesus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Dorothy Day and that it was his “intent to do God’s will.” Greg, who gave both opening and closing statements, shared that he, too, was a veteran who was trained to fight and win a nuclear war. He said that nuclear weapons provide an illusion of security and that the U.S. was in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty that it signed. He also characterized their action as a “miracle,”  when explaining how they were able to get to the HEUF. In his closing statement he illustrated what the good Samaritan parable really means for us today and that like the emperor of the fairy tale, the DOE is naked and does not have real security. Quoting the prophet Isaiah, Greg declared that real security comes “when we have justice for all the nations.”

Ann Wright, a former career military officer and diplomat who is now a peace activist,  testified as an expert witness in national security. Referring to her experience in once helping to oversee the transfer of enriched uranium from Kazakistan to the Oak Ridge Y-12 facility she underscored how dangerous nuclear material is and expressed her shock at the flawed internal security at Y-12.

One moment of tragic irony in the trial for me occurred when the prosecution was questioning Retired General Rodney Johnson, who is now in charge of maintenance at Y-12.  As he was itemizing the expenses for “decontaminating” the exterior of the HEUF building due to blood being poured and messages being spray-painted on it, nothing was ever said about the highly enriched uranium contained inside the building and how this substance could destroy life and cause irreversible contamination of the environment. It was as if this lethal material was invisible and that this was simply a storage building like any other. This was the kind of psychic numbing–the utter failure to come to terms with the truth– that was operative throughout the trial.

Two other special moments that occurred during the trial involved the acknowledgment of two deceased friends and peacemakers. Tom Lewis, a member of the Catonsville Nine and plowshares activist was mentioned because his blood, which had been frozen for use in a future plowshares action, was used in this action. And Fr. Dick McSorley, SJ was mentioned in the testimony since a quote from him, “It’s A Sin To Build A Nuclear Weapon,” was left at the Y-12 site. It was a beautiful occasion to see the joy on the face of Sr. Rosemary McSorley, Dick’s sister, who was present at the trial, when her brother’s name was invoked.

In Greg’s opening statement he recited from one of Mike’s favorite scripture passages: If today you hear God’s voice harden not your hearts.(Psalm 95) Despite the irrefutable truths that were spoken in court by Sr. Megan, Greg and Mike, and their outstanding legal team of Bill Quigley, Frank Lloyd, Chris Irwin, Bobbie Hudson and Anabel Dwyer, about the immorality and illegality of nuclear weapons, and the urgent need to bring about a disarmed world, the jury could not bring itself to accept their defense. Psychic numbing prevailed. God’s law was not heeded. And international law and elements of the necessity defense, which had been previously ruled by Judge Thapar as inadmissible evidence, was not deemed relevant. Thus, the TNP were really convicted for rejecting the sinful policy of deterrence and for exposing and nonviolently resisting an empire which has as its centerpiece the nuclear idol.

On May 9,  the morning after Sr. Megan, Mike and Greg were convicted and jailed, our community gathered outside the court before attending a special hearing to see if our now imprisoned friends would be eligible for release. I offered a selection from Dan Berrigan (whose 92nd birthday was the same day) to help put into perspective and gain some deeper insight into what we experienced in court and how that is a reflection of daily life in a nuclear empire. In Testimony: The Word Made Fresh,  Dan writes the following in the chapter titled ‘An Ethic of Resurrection’:

…The ethic of the body given, the blood outpoured! The act led straight to the scaffold and to that “beyond” we name for want of a better word, resurrection. We have not, in this century or any other, improved on this. More, being equally fearful of living and dying, we have yet to experience resurrection, which I translate, “the hope that hopes on.”

A blasphemy against this hope is named deterrence, or Trident submarine, or star wars, or preemptive strike, or simply, any nuclear weapon. These are in direct violation of the commandment of Jesus: “Your ancestors said: ‘An eyes for an eyes,’ but I say to you, offer no violent resistance to evil. Love your enemies.” That is why we speak again and again of 1980 and all the Plowshares actions since, how some of us continue to break the demonic clutch on our souls of the ethic of Mars, of wars and rumors of wars, inevitable wars, just wars, necessary wars, victorious wars, and say our no in acts of despair. For us, all these repeated arrest, the interminable jailings, the life of our small communities, the discipline of nonviolence, these have embodied and ethic of resurrection.

Simply put, we long to taste that event, its thunders and quakes, its great yes. We want to test the resurrection in our bones. To see if we might live in hope, instead of the silva oscura, the thicket of cultural despair, nuclear despair, a world of perpetual war. We want to taste the resurrection.

May I say we have not been disappointed.

Filled with a spirit of resurrection hope, we all sang together: “We Shall Not Be Moved” before entering the court.

When Sr. Megan, Mike and Greg were brought into the courtroom in shackles we sang: “Sacred the Land.” What we then witnessed during this detention hearing  was a legal squabble about whether Sr. Megan, Mike and Greg can now be treated under the violent crimes act and deemed ineligible for pre-sentencing release. Judge Thapar said he felt “boxed in” by Congress because no differentiation was made between peace activists and terrorists in applying this new statute concerning the destruction of national defense materials. Has the judge become so enslaved by the law that he can’t exercise his own discretion and make a distinction between peacemakers and violent terrorists?  The judge still has an opportunity to act in the interest of justice at sentencing and in his final ruling on whether the sabotage charge should, in fact, be dismissed. Still, the prosecution continues to act vindictively against the TNP and insists that the national defense was injured and obstructed by our three friends.  And so Sr. Megan, Mike and Greg were initially ordered jailed and to be brought back for another hearing in two weeks. However, on May 10 Judge Thapar issued a new ruling saying that the TNP will be detained through their September 23 sentencing. This is because the offense that they are convicted of carries a  maximum prison term of ten years or more and thus falls under the “federal crime of terrorism.” This ludicrous assertion is a blatant misuse of the law and an attempt to mischaracterize and distort the nonviolent  intent of the Transform Now Plowshares. The truth of their action stands on its own.

STATEMENT: God’s Promise Endures – The Challenge of Peace Today

Below is a statement originally issued as a sign-on statement in May 2008 on the 25th anniversary of the U.S. bishops’ peace pastoral, The Challenge of Peace. We repost it here during this month in celebration of the 30th anniversary of the peace pastoral.

Twenty-five years ago, at the height of the Cold War, the U.S. Catholic Bishops issued their historic pastoral letter on war and peace in the nuclear age, The Challenge of Peace: God’s Promise and Our Response. The “peace pastoral” affirmed the position of Christian nonviolence in the Catholic tradition and reaffirmed Vatican II’s condemnation of nuclear weapons: “The [nuclear] arms race is one of the greatest curses on the human race, an act of aggression against the poor and a folly which does not provide the security it promises.” (The Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, No. 81)

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

While in 1983 the U.S. Catholic Bishops made clear that nuclear weapons can never be used, they stopped short of condemning nuclear deterrence—the policy of maintaining large arsenals of nuclear weapons solely to prevent the use of those weapons. In that historical moment, they offered only a “strictly conditioned moral acceptance ” of nuclear deterrence. Specifically, they said this must be an interim, not long-term policy; that it was only to prevent the use of nuclear weapons by others; and that it must be “a step on the way toward a progressive disarmament.”

Ten years later, in The Harvest of Justice is Sown in Peace, the bishops further specified that “progressive disarmament” must mean a commitment to the elimination of nuclear weapons, not simply as an ideal, but as a concrete policy goal.

Since 1983, the position of the Catholic Church has evolved and concluded that nuclear deterrence is no longer a suitable or moral means to preserving peace. “Policies of nuclear deterrence, typical of the Cold War period, must be replaced with concrete measures of disarmament based on dialogue and multilateral negotiations” (Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Catholic Church). Indeed, in 2005 at the Review Conference of the Nonproliferation Treaty, Vatican Representative Archbishop Celestino Migliore said, “The Holy See has never countenanced nuclear deterrence as a permanent measure, nor does it today when it is evident that nuclear deterrence drives the development of ever newer nuclear arms, thus preventing genuine nuclear disarmament.”

It is abundantly clear that the U.S. policy of nuclear deterrence has been institutionalized—been made a “permanent measure,” the very “long-term basis for peace” that the U.S. Catholic Bishops rejected in The Challenge of Peace— and that the United States has no policy goal of eliminating either these immoral weapons or their central role in U.S. national security strategy planning.

Rather, the United States has today embarked on a $150 billion reinvestment in its nuclear weapons arsenal dubbed Complex Transformation (formerly known as Complex 2030). The United States is modernizing its nuclear arsenal and modifying existing warheads to achieve new capabilities; retooling its capacity for nuclear weapons research, design and production; enhancing systems necessary to plan and execute nuclear strikes; and has developed a “Global Strike” capability that allows the United States to launch nuclear weapons against any target on earth in less than a few hours.

As Catholic Christians and followers of the nonviolent Jesus, we reject this “institutionalization” of nuclear deterrence as nothing less than nuclear terrorism.

WE CALL on the Bush Administration to abandon the $150 billion Complex Transformation program as a provocative and unnecessary initiation of a new nuclear arms race and, as such, an unconscionable theft from the poor as articulated by Vatican II.

WE CALL on the Catholic Church in the United States to evaluate current U.S. nuclear weapons policy and expenditures in strict accordance with their moral conclusions of 1983 and 1993, and to finally pronounce its rejection of the morality of nuclear deterrence.

WE CALL on all Catholics and people of faith to evaluate candidates for President and Congress based on their commitment to change U.S. nuclear weapons policy.

The time has come for the Catholic Church in the United States to renounce the deception of nuclear deterrence. As the Vatican so clearly stated over ten years ago: “Nuclear weapons are incompatible with the peace we seek for the 21st century. They cannot be justified. They deserve condemnation. The preservation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty demands an unequivocal commitment to their abolition. . . . This is a moral challenge, a legal challenge and a political challenge. That multiple-based challenge must be met by the application of our humanity.”

REFLECTION: First disciples create a model for dealing with contention in the church

Bishop Thomas Gumbletonby Bishop Thomas Gumbleton
Pax Christi USA Teacher of Peace

Sometimes things are happening in the world around us that provide a very good context to listen to the Scriptures, as we’re doing this morning during this liturgy. What’s going on, you may have heard about, is controversy within our church. This past week, there was a demonstration [in Detroit] of people who call themselves Fortunate Families. They were demonstrating in front of the archbishop’s office because they’re families who have committed gay members within them, or lesbian members.

They refuse to say, “I can’t go to holy Communion because I accept my child into my home,” so they’re demonstrating. This evening, there’s going to be a Mass at Marygrove, and it’s sponsored by Dignity, a Catholic organization of gay and lesbian people. We’ve been notified that there’s going to be a group there demonstrating, protesting. They call themselves the Cardinal Newman Society. They feel Dignity — this group — ought not to be able to celebrate Eucharist.

This is a very difficult struggle going on in our church — trying to come to grips with church teaching regarding homosexuality and perhaps a need for some new understandings on our part. But if you were listening, that’s nothing new that there would be this kind of dissention going on in the church. It was there right at the very beginning. When you listen to the Acts of the Apostles this morning, Luke has kind of glossed things over so it really doesn’t seem as difficult as it was, but this is a struggle that went on for probably 30 or 40 years. Luke was writing in the late 80s, but the struggle started right at the beginning, practically, 30 or 40 years before.

To read this entire article, click here.

REFLECTION: Only 32 states left after Maryland’s repeal of the death penalty

Rev. John Dear, S.J.

by Fr. John Dear, S.J.
Pax Christi USA Ambassador of Peace

Maryland’s had the death penalty since 1638; that is, until Thursday, when Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley signed a law abolishing it. This is cause for great rejoicing and gratitude. Maryland becomes the 18th state to abolish the death penalty. Six states have done so in the last six years. That leaves 32 states.

“Maryland has effectively eliminated a policy that is proven not to work,” O’Malley said. “Evidence shows that the death penalty is not a deterrent, it cannot be administered without racial bias, and it costs three times as much as life in prison without parole,” he said in a statement. “Furthermore, there is no way to reverse a mistake if an innocent person is put to death. Working together with law enforcement partners, Maryland has driven down violent crime and homicides to three decade lows.”

You could say that after almost 400 years, Maryland has finally entered the age of enlightenment. Ben Jealous, president of the NAACP, put it this way: “This is the day we join the rest of Western civilization.”

Does that mean that the other 32 states have yet to join Western civilization? Unfortunately, yes…

Click here to read this entire article.