Category Archives: Immigration

REGIONAL NEWS: PC Illinois joins immigrant rights advocates against for-profit immigrant prison!

PC Illinois members at immigrant rights rally. (from left: Joyce Ruhaak, Tom Cordaro, Bill Ruhaak and Pat Riley)

PC Illinois members at immigrant rights rally. (from left: Joyce Ruhaak, Tom Cordaro, Bill Ruhaak and Pat Riley)

Over twelve-hundred residents and friends of Joliet, including members of Pax Christi Illinois, gathered Saturday, April 6th to march in opposition to any and all possibilities of building a for-profit immigrant prison in the city of Joliet.

As Keith Michael Estrada of the Diocese of Joliet Office for Human Dignity described the event, “[We were] marching in the name of family unity and human dignity, Americans, including those of African, Caucasian, and Hispanic descent, heard the testimonies of people who have already been directly affected by the violence to human dignity caused by these Corrections Corporation of America facilities.”

Participants were urged to “march today, vote tomorrow” as citizens across the state prepare for local elections on April 9th. A number of local politicians and religious leaders spoke at the event, as organizers urged participants to hold elected leaders accountable for positions they take that effect the immigrant community.

Pax Christi Ambassador of Peace Tom Cordaro pointed out, “This is what it means to stand in solidarity with our immigrant brothers and sisters.  It is a good example of being anti-racist peacemakers; following the lead of Latina/o communities and learning to be accountable to people of color.”

IMMIGRATION: PCUSA endorses sign-on letter urging a ban on profiling in immigration legislation

Pax Christi USA endorses the letter (below) of the Leadership Conference on Civil & Human Rights which expresses strong support for the immigration reform principles’ commitment to a roadmap to citizenship–which should be broad, welcoming, and not contingent upon more border enforcement. PCUSA also supports the inclusion of language in any immigration bill that strengthens prohibitions against racial profiling and inappropriate use of force, but a bill which also enhances the training of border patrol agents, increases oversight, and creates a mechanism for meaningful opportunity for border communities to share their input.

Dear Senators Leahy and Schumer:

On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, and the undersigned national organizations, we express our strong support for the immigration reform principles’ commitment to a roadmap to citizenship—which should be broad, welcoming, and not contingent upon more border enforcement. We also support the inclusion of language in any immigration bill that will not only strengthen prohibitions against racial profiling and inappropriate use of force, but also enhance the training of border patrol agents, increase oversight, and create a mechanism for a meaningful opportunity for border communities to share their input.

Racial profiling is the use of race, color, ethnicity, religion, or national origin, by law enforcement agents as a factor in deciding whom to question, investigate, stop, search, or arrest, except where these characteristics are part of a specific suspect description. It results in serious human rights violations, the misallocation of law enforcement resources, and is an ineffective law enforcement practice. Racial profiling is a pervasive and harmful practice that negatively impacts both individuals and communities, resulting in a loss of trust and confidence in local, state, and federal law enforcement. Individuals and communities impacted by racial profiling are less likely to cooperate with law enforcement agencies they have grown to mistrust, which hinders criminal investigations and makes all communities less safe.

Immigration and border enforcement measures, including routine actions by state and local law enforcement seeking to determine an individual’s immigration status, entail a risk of racial profiling. For example, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) claims jurisdiction within 100 miles of all U.S. borders. Some agents have focused their attention on people of color without regard to citizenship merely because they are perceived to look or sound “foreign.”[i] These discriminatory practices have understandably led immigrant communities and communities of color to fear and avoid police.

Immigration enforcement programs have expanded their scope and partnerships to the point where every law enforcement agency – federal, state, tribal and local – plays a role. The devolution of immigration enforcement to state and local law enforcement has exacerbated racial profiling. Federal programs like the Criminal Alien Program, the 287(g) program and Secure Communities along with state laws like Arizona’s SB 1070 have created incentives for the police to make pre-textual arrests based on racial stereotypes and other impermissible bases so that immigration status can be checked.[ii] In order to address racial profiling in the context of immigration enforcement, Congress should include in the upcoming legislation a strong reaffirmation of federal preemption over state and local immigration enforcement, and all law enforcement agencies must be held accountable.

Our nation’s immigration laws should reflect the values of fair and equal treatment and due process under the law. Current federal law enforcement guidance and state laws provide incomplete solutions to the nationwide problem of racial profiling.

We strongly urge you to support this vital component of immigration reform legislation, which would ensure that law enforcement and transportation security agencies are prohibited from impermissibly using race, color ethnicity, national origin, or religion in carrying out their duties.

Please feel free to contact Lexer Quamie, Senior Counsel at The Leadership Conference at quamie@civilrights.org or (202) 466-3648 or Nancy Zirkin at zirkin@civilrights.org or (202) 263-2880. We thank you for your serious attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and co-signers

IMMIGRATION: New Sanctuary movement at the border can spiritually transform us

by John Fife, NCR

The situation on the southwestern U.S. border in the 1980s led to a movement of faith communities we called Sanctuary. In 1980 we began to learn that refugees from the death squads, torture and massacres of villages in El Salvador and Guatemala were arriving at the border.

The U.S. government refused to recognize them as refugees; thousands were being arrested, imprisoned and deported in handcuffs back to the death squads, torture, massacres and wars. The church on both sides of the border began to respond in ministry to the needs of the refugees in the ways you would expect — food, shelter, medical care and legal aid. Church volunteers enabled refugees to apply for political asylum, represented at hearings by lawyers funded by the Tucson Ecumenical Council in Arizona.

But by 1981 we were dismayed to learn that no one from El Salvador or Guatemala was being granted asylum. Our government was in political, military and economic support of the regimes that were ordering the repression. Our allies could not be creating refugees; we were bringing democracy and development to Central America.

My colleague Jim Corbett, a brilliant Quaker rancher, defined the ethical challenge to the church clearly, pointing to two examples in history — the abolition movement, when churches and people of faith formed an underground railroad to help escaped slaves cross borders and move north to safety, and the failure of the European church to protect Jewish refugees fleeing the Holocaust.

A few of us began to hide refugees in homes in Tucson. It didn’t take long to run out of room in homes, and the church that I served as pastor began to take in refugees. The Border Patrol soon discovered our smuggling organization and sent a message: “We know what you’re doing. Stop or we will indict you on felony charges.”

Before we were indicted, we decided to go public by declaring Southside Presbyterian Church a sanctuary for refugees from Central America. Four other churches joined us in 1982, and a movement began…

To read the entire article, click here.

IMMIGRATION: DREAM Day of Action is May 17

from LCWR

Dream Act

On May 17, immigrant youth, along with allies across the country, will issue a “Declaration of DREAMS.”

The Declaration outlines several rights for undocumented youth, including the right to live with dignity in the country they call home, the right to live with their families, and the right to education.

There are many ways to join in on May 17:

  • Organize an event. Are there members of your community facing deportation? Highlight their stories in a local press conference or other type of event. (Register your event here and UWD can provide an organizing tool kit and media support.)
  • Attend an event. Check the UWD map to find event locations.
  • Submit an op-ed to your local newspaper, telling the story of one or more DREAMers in your community and highlighting the Declaration of Dreams.
  • Sign on to the Declaration of Dreams and share it on Twitter, Facebook, etc.

On May 17, immigrant youth, along with allies across the country, will issue our declaration of DREAMS. Through the Right to Dream campaign, we’re launching a nationwide call to President Obama for real and lasting relief for DREAMers and our communities.

IMMIGRATION: Faith Leaders call upon President, Congress to reassert authority on immigration law

from Justice for Immigrants

In letters sent April 24, on the eve of oral arguments to the Supreme Court on Arizona’s immigration law, 15 religious leaders urged President Barack Obama and the 112th Congress to “reassert your authority” and move to enact immigration reform legislation “as soon as possible.”

The national faith leaders expressed concern that, because of its inaction on this issue for several years, the federal government is implicitly transferring “unprecedented authority” to state and local governments to implement immigration policy, to the “detriment of our nation and our local communities.”

Click here to read the letters and send your own.

REFLECTION: Time for crisp, colorful salad

Fr. John Rauschby Fr. John S. Rausch, PCUSA Teacher of Peace

When Alabama’s tough immigration law, HB 56, took effect last September, Holy Cross Catholic Church in Russellville, AL, lost nearly 30 Hispanic families who left the state for fear of arrest.  According to the U.S. Census Bureau, only 120,000 of the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants live in Alabama, less than 2.5 percent of the state’s population.

Also, with the harvest season just beginning, Alabama farmers saw crops worth millions of dollars rotting in their fields because they lacked skilled workers to bring them in.  The Alabama Center for Business and Economic Research estimates that HB 56 will cost the state 140,000 direct and indirect jobs, and the state’s GDP will shrink by $2.3 billion to $10.8 billion.   Yet, Alabama which borders neither Mexico nor Canada reputedly has the harshest immigration law in the country.

Whereas under federal law, being in the United States without proper documentation constitutes a civil violation and cause for deportation, under Alabama law it’s a criminal offense.   The Federal District Court in Birmingham issued preliminary injunctions that affect certain parts of the law, but HB 56 still penalizes anyone who knowingly employs, or rents to, undocumented immigrants.  It nullifies any contracts entered into by undocumented immigrants and prohibits them from receiving state or local public services that some officials even interpret to include running water.  Elementary and secondary schools are required to determine the immigration status of incoming students, thus intimidating many children and deterring some from attending school while their parents work.

Proponents of HB 56 claim undocumented immigrants take jobs away from legal residents of Alabama and they add a financial burden by using public services.  However, one in every five jobs in Alabama is connected to agriculture.  With the great exodus of farm workers after the bill’s passage, farmers found few unemployed Alabamians with the physical stamina and skill needed for the field work.  One farmer claimed in a month’s time 75 Alabamians worked on her farm, but only 15 of them returned more than once and only 3 lasted the entire month.

Currently the Alabama legislature is reconsidering HB 56 to make some of its provisions more easily enforceable while retaining the toughest parts.  However, since according to the U.S. Constitution immigration policy rightly belongs to the federal government, state legislatures might resist drafting their own immigration laws and instead pass resolutions instructing their congressional representatives to overhaul the entire U.S. immigration system.

The church’s teaching on immigration emphasizes respect for each person as a son and daughter of God.  Persons have the right to migrate to support themselves and their families, especially when global economic forces deprive them of opportunities in their own homeland.  While sovereign nations have a right to control their borders, they also have an obligation to the universal common good and therefore need just laws to accommodate migration.  And, those laws must respect the human rights and human dignity even of undocumented migrants.

The nativist sentiment and xenophobia implicit in harsh immigration bills robs the nation and Alabama of the potential creativity and energy that immigrants bring.  A study by the National Foundation reports that nearly half of America’s business start-ups have a founder who was foreign-born.

Add to the economic considerations, the social cohesion that many immigrants bring with their strong family life and their cultural values that defuse rampant materialism.  Based on the church’s social teachings, rather than a melting pot America and Alabama could resemble a salad bursting with bright colors and crisp new ideas for forming community and living without fear.

IMMIGRATION: U.S. Bishops file brief in Arizona vs. United States

The USCCB, citing numerous examples of federal immigration policies designed to further family unity and human dignity, filed a brief which argued that Arizona’s SB 1070 is not a solution to the problems in federal law and in fact creates more problems than it solves.